The article discusses the development of the hierarchical structure of the criminal community. The beginning of the stratification of prisoners is associated with the development of the prison system of pre-revolutionary Russia. Criminals isolated from lawabiding citizens since the creation of the prison system in Russia made up a community that was a well-organized and close-knit community of «thieves». Being a mirror image of society the prison commune was heterogeneous and, accordingly, was stratified into a ruling class, into an exploited class and outcasts. With a change in the social system and the punitive policy of the state the system of stratification in the criminal community was modified too. So, by the beginning of the twentieth century, when there was a sharp increase in the number of prisoners, the prison commune was losing its significance and the prison community was replacing it. At the initial stage of the functioning of the camps, convicts were kept without protection under the supervision of the administration. Labor was mandatory for all categories of offenders serving their sentences. Changing the conditions of detention in the camps entailed the stratification of the camps into categories. Accordingly the previously existing formal system of stratification of the contingent has undergone a change. In modern conditions stratification has its own characteristics in different correctional institutions. The article reveals these features as well as characterizes certain categories of convicts.
Keywords: stratification; a convicted; law; the criminal world; criminal subculture
Professor of the Department of Penal Law and Organization of
Educational Work with Convicts of the Law Faculty of the Vologda Institute of Law
and Economics of the Federal Penal Service of Russia, Chief Researcher of the
Research Institute of the Federal Penal Service of Russia, Dsc. in Law, Professor
, e-mail firstname.lastname@example.org
Deputy Head of the Department of Criminal Law and Criminology of the Moscow Regional Branch of the Moscow University of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of Russia named after V. Ya. Kikot, PhD. in Law
, e-mail email@example.com
1. Anisimkov V. M. Kriminal’naya subkul’tura [Criminal subculture]. Ufa, 1998. 168 p. (In Russ.).
2. Antonyan E. A. Kriminal’naya subkul’tura osuzhdennyh [Criminal Subculture of Convicts]. Filosofskie nauki – Philosophical
sciences, 2010, no. 5, pp. 72–81. (In Russ.).
3. Antonyan YU. M. Glubinnye istoki kriminal’noj subkul’tury [The deepest sources of the criminal subculture]. Rossijskij
kriminologicheskij vzglyad – Russian criminological view, 2009, no. 2, pp. 324–331. (In Russ.).
4. Gromov V. G. Kriminogennost’ mest lisheniya svobody i ee nejtralizaciya. Diss. dokt. yurid. nauk [Criminogenicity of
places of imprisonment and its neutralization. Diss. Dsc. in Law]. Saratov, 2009. 447 p. (In Russ.).
5. Egoshin O. A. O pervoj gosudarevoj tyur’me na Marijskoj zemle [About the first sovereign prison on Mari land]. Vestnik
Marijskogo Gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Ser. «Istoricheskie nauki. YUridicheskie nauki» – Bulletin of Mari State
University. Series «Historical Sciences. Legal Sciences», 2007, no. 3 (11), pp. 17–25. (In Russ.).
6. Krasheninnikova YA. M., Detkov M. G. Tyur’my, lagerya i kolonii Rossii [Prisons, camps and colonies of Russia]. Moscow,
1999. 448 p. (In Russ.).
7. Lihachev D. S. CHerty pervobytnogo primitivizma vorovskoj rechi [Features of the primeval primitivism of thieves
language]. YAzyk i myshlenie. Vyp. 3–4 [Language and thinking. Iss. 3–4]. Moscow, Leningrad, 1935, pp. 47–100. (In
8. Petuhov E. A. Istoriya penitenciarnoj sistemy Zabajkal’skoj oblasti (80-e gody XIX v. – fevral’ 1917 g.). Diss. kand. ist.
nauk [The history of the penal system of the Transbaikal region (80s of the XIX century. – February 1917). Diss. PhD. in
History]. Ulan-Ude, 2004. 152 p. (In Russ.).