About the improvement of the criminal-procedural means of resolving conflicts during preliminary investigation
This article is devoted to the conflicts arising during the preliminary investigation and to the legal ways to resolve them. The authors focus on the conflicts arising between the investigator and the defense side, as well as between other participants of the criminal process. The classificationofsuchconflicts, aswellasofmethodsandmeansoftheirsolution(neutralization) is present. The most important of such means the authors consider the criminal procedural methods. In order to fill the gaps in law that prevent resolving conflicts by procedural means or repressing the violations of law during the preliminary investigation, the authors formulate the proposals for improvement of the current criminal-procedural law.
Keywords: preliminary investigation; conflict of interest; counter-action to crime investigation; criminal-procedural means of resolving conflicts.
2 Chufarovskij Ju.V. Psihologija operativno-rozysknoj i sledstvennoj dejatel’nosti. M., 2006. S. 145.
3 Sm. podr.: Petrova A.P. Protivodejstvie rassledovaniju, kriminalisticheskie i inye mery ego preodolenija: Dis. … kand. jurid. nauk. Volgograd, 2000. S. 237.
4 Sm.: Belkin R.S. Kurs sovetskoj kriminalistiki. M., 1979. T. 3. S. 80.
5 Sm.: Babaeva Je.U. Osnovy kriminalisticheskoj teorii preodolenija protivodejstvija ugolovnomu presledovaniju: Dis. … d-ra jurid. nauk. M., 2006. S. 345.
6 Sm.: Baev O.Ja. Konflikty v dejatel’nosti sledovatelja. Voronezh, 1981. S. 82.
7 Sm. podr.: Franciforov Ju.V. Osobennosti razreshenija sledovatelem protivorechij pri podgotovke i provedenii sledstvennyh dejstvij // Ugolovnoe sudoproizvodstvo. 2007.
№ 3. S. 18.
8 Sm.: Belkin R.S. Kriminalisticheskoe obespechenie dejatel’nosti kriminal’noj milicii organov predvaritel’nogo rassledovanija. M., 1997. S. 143–149.
9 Sm.: Franciforov Ju.V. Osobennostirazreshenijasledovatelem
protivorechij pri podgotovke i provedenii sledstvennyh dejstvij. S. 19.
10 Sm.: Strogovich M.S. Pravo obvinjaemogo na zawitu i prezumpcija nevinovnosti. M., 1984. S. 131.
11 Ljubichev S.G. Jeticheskie osnovy sledstvennoj taktiki. M., 1980. S. 10–16.
12 Sm.: Koblikov A.S. Juridicheskaja jetika. M., 2007. S. 88.
13 Ratinov A.R. Sudebnaja psihologija dlja sledovatelej. M., 2001. S. 195.
14 Sm.: Luk’janchenko V.V. Obvinitel’nyj uklon pri primenenii ugolovnogo zakonodatel’stva: projavlenija, posledstvija,
prichiny i puti preodolenija: Dis. … kand. jurid. nauk. Stavropol’, 2000. S. 4.
15 Hasan B.I. O ponjatijnoj sheme i osobennostjah konflikta v dejatel’nosti po rassledovaniju prestuplenij // Problemy psihologii sledstvennyh dejstvij: Sb. nauch. statej / Pod red. A.R. Ratinova. Krasnojarsk, 1986. S. 49.
16 Sm.: Ryt’kova V.Ju. Pravovoe regulirovanie processual’nogo statusa sledovatelja v ugolovnom sudoproizvodstve: Avtoref. dis.
… kand. jurid. nauk. Kaliningrad, 2007. S. 15.
