Journal section JURISPRUDENCE
Some aspects of the penal crime prevention
The article raises some aspects of the prevention of convicts crimes in penal institutions and to develop measures to prevent the penal crimes, are analyzed specific causes of committing crimes in penal institutions, taking into account the results of the survey of convicts and employees of the correctional system. The author pays particular attention to the impact of factors such as the failure to comply with regulations and organizational and administrative documents, the deterioration of the technical maintenance of penal institutions.
Keywords: prison crime; preventive measures; a crime; convicted; penal institutions; regime; technical equipment facilities.
-
Deputy Head of the Department of Security Organization of
the Security and Convoy Department of the Federal Penal Service of Russia, PhD.
in Law, Associate Professor
, e-mail hohrinsa@mail.ru
1 Bekkaria Ch. O prestuplenijah i nakazanijah. M., 1995.
S. 230. 2 Rezul’taty anketirovanija rukovodjashhego sostava
sotrudnikov ispravitel’nyh uchrezhdenij (vsego oprosheno 418
respondentov). 3 Sm., napr.: Mihlin A.S. Lichnost’ osuzhdennyh k lisheniju
svobody i problemy ih ispravlenija i perevospitanija. Frunze,
1980; Antonjan Ju.M. Psihologicheskoe otchuzhdenie lichnosti
i prestupnoe povedenie. Erevan, 1987; Abel’cev S.N. Lichnost’
prestupnika i problemy kriminal’nogo nasilija. M., 2000;
Rastoropov S.V. Bor’ba s umyshlennym prichineniem tjazhkogo
vreda zdorov’ju grazhdan v ispravitel’nyh kolonijah. M.; Rjazan’,
2000; Tard G. La cpiminalite compare. P., 1886; Klark R.
Prestupnost’ v SShA. M., 1975. 4 Sm.: Gorjainov K.K., Zajchenko E.Ju. Napravlenija razvitija
operativno-rozysknoj dejatel’nosti v ugolovno-ispolnitel’noj
sisteme // Vestnik instituta: prestuplenie, nakazanie, ispravlenie.
2014. № 25. S. 24. 5 Sm.: Habarov A.V. Nekotorye aspekty sovershenstvovanija
raboty s lichnym sostavom // II Mezhdunarodnyj penitenciarnyj
forum «Prestuplenie, nakazanie, ispravlenie». Rjazan’, 2015. 6 V ramkah izuchenija voprosov sovershenija osuzhdennymi
prestuplenij v period otbyvanija nakazanija nami byli oprosheny
1763 chel. v 37 territorial’nyh organah FSIN Rossii.
S. 230. 2 Rezul’taty anketirovanija rukovodjashhego sostava
sotrudnikov ispravitel’nyh uchrezhdenij (vsego oprosheno 418
respondentov). 3 Sm., napr.: Mihlin A.S. Lichnost’ osuzhdennyh k lisheniju
svobody i problemy ih ispravlenija i perevospitanija. Frunze,
1980; Antonjan Ju.M. Psihologicheskoe otchuzhdenie lichnosti
i prestupnoe povedenie. Erevan, 1987; Abel’cev S.N. Lichnost’
prestupnika i problemy kriminal’nogo nasilija. M., 2000;
Rastoropov S.V. Bor’ba s umyshlennym prichineniem tjazhkogo
vreda zdorov’ju grazhdan v ispravitel’nyh kolonijah. M.; Rjazan’,
2000; Tard G. La cpiminalite compare. P., 1886; Klark R.
Prestupnost’ v SShA. M., 1975. 4 Sm.: Gorjainov K.K., Zajchenko E.Ju. Napravlenija razvitija
operativno-rozysknoj dejatel’nosti v ugolovno-ispolnitel’noj
sisteme // Vestnik instituta: prestuplenie, nakazanie, ispravlenie.
2014. № 25. S. 24. 5 Sm.: Habarov A.V. Nekotorye aspekty sovershenstvovanija
raboty s lichnym sostavom // II Mezhdunarodnyj penitenciarnyj
forum «Prestuplenie, nakazanie, ispravlenie». Rjazan’, 2015. 6 V ramkah izuchenija voprosov sovershenija osuzhdennymi
prestuplenij v period otbyvanija nakazanija nami byli oprosheny
1763 chel. v 37 territorial’nyh organah FSIN Rossii.
