To the question about archaization psychological space of the person in imprisonment places
In article an attempt is made to comprehend the problem of the psychological space of an individual in conditions of unfreedom. Its relevance is determined by the nature of the phenomenon being studied, which is an important component of both personal development and human interaction with the environment. During the consideration of the main approaches in the study area, attention is focused on the reasons for the archaization of the psychological space of convicts serving criminal punishment in imprisonment places. Of particular interest is the consideration of value-semantic, behavioral and emotional characteristics in the context of constructing and further changing the psychological space of the individual under the influence of the criminal component of the penitentiary society. The conclusion is drawn that it is necessary to carry out an empirical study with a view to further studying the concept considered in the article.
Keywords: archaization; psychological system; psychological space; criminalisation of the person; an imprisonment place.
lichnosti v zakrytoj srede (na primere mest lishenija svobody) : dis.
... kand. psihol. nauk. Tomsk, 2010.
2 Sm.: Brushlinskij A. V. Problema sub#ekta v psihologicheskoj
nauke // Soznanie lichnosti v krizisnom obshhestve. M., 1995.
S. 28–41.
3 Sommer R. Personal space: Behavioral basis of design.
N. Y., 1969.
4 Sm.: Ollport G. Lichnost’ v psihologii. M. ; SPb., 1998.
S. 282.
5 Sm.: Nartova-Bochaver S. K. Ponjatie «psihologicheskoe
prostranstvo lichnosti»: obosnovanie i prikladnoe znachenie //
Psihologicheskij zhurnal. 2003. T. 24. № 6. S. 27–36.
6 Mozgovaja N. N. Razvitie predstavlenij o lichnostnom
prostranstve studentov pedagogicheskogo vuza : dis. … kand.
psihol. nauk. Stavropol’, 2002. S. 37.
7 Sm.: Klochko V. E. Samoorganizacija v psihologicheskih
sistemah: problemy stanovlenija mental’nogo prostranstva
lichnosti (vvedenie v transspektivnyj analiz). Tomsk, 2005. S. 34.
8 Tam zhe. S. 33–34.
9 Sm.: Zhuravlev A. L., Kuprechenko A. B. Social’nopsihologicheskoe
prostranstvo samoopredeljajushhegosja
sub#ekta: ponimanie, harakteristiki, vidy // Vestnik prakticheskoj
psihologii obrazovanija. 2007. № 2 (11). S. 7–13.
10 Sm.: Seryj A. V. Sistema lichnostnyh smyslov: struktura,
funkcii, dinamika. Kemerovo, 2004. S. 136.
11 Sm.: Klochko V. E. Stanovlenie mnogomernogo mira
cheloveka kak sushhnost’ ontogeneza // Sibirskij psihologicheskij
zhurnal. 1998. № 8–9. S. 7–15.
12 Sm.: Datij A. V., Pestrikov D. V. Osobennosti rolevogo
povedenija osuzhdennyh // Vestnik instituta: prestuplenie,
nakazanie, ispravlenie. 2014. № 4 (28). S. 70–75.
13 Sm.: Klochko V. E. Samoorganizacija v psihologicheskih
sistemah: problemy stanovlenija mental’nogo prostranstva
lichnosti (vvedenie v transspektivnyj analiz). S. 30.
14 Sm.: Seryj A. V., Janickij M. S. Smyslovye aspekty
perezhivanija krizisa social’noj identichnosti pri vynuzhdennoj
smene zhiznennoj situacii // Psihologicheskie issledovanija.
2015. № 43. T. 8. S. 12.
15 Sm.: Ahiezer A. S. Arhaizacija v rossijskom obshhestve
kak metodologicheskaja problema // Obshhestvennye nauki i
sovremennost’. 2001. № 2. S. 89–100.
16 Sm.: Novohat’ko E. N. Psihologicheskaja pomoshh’
migrantam v perestrojke cennostno-smyslovyh sostavljajushhih
obraza mira (na primere vynuzhdennyh pereselencev) : dis. …
kand. psihol. nauk. Rostov n/D, 2005. S. 43.
17 Sm.: Nekrasova E. V. Prostranstvenno-vremennaja
organizacija zhiznennogo mira cheloveka : avtoref. dis. … d-ra
psihol. nauk. Barnaul, 2005. S. 14.
18 Sm.: Lihachev D. S. Cherty pervobytnogo primitivizma
vorovskoj rechi // Jazyk i myshlenie. M. ; L., 1935. № III-IV.
S. 47–100.
