Forced Feeding and Artificial Feeding of Convicts: Terminological Dispute or Substantive Difference
Avdyukhin S.A. Forced feeding and artificial feeding of convicts: terminological dispute or substantive difference. Penitentiary Science, 2024, vol. 18, no. 3 (67), pp. 289–296. doi: 10.46741/2686-9764.2024.67.3.008.
: the article discusses the possibility of replacing the term “forced feeding”, used in Part 4 of Article 101 of the Penal Code of the Russian Federation, with the term “artificial feeding”,enshrined in a number of international documents. Results: the term “artificial feeding” is by its nature medical (non-legal) and includes several possible ways of feeding a person in an unnatural way: both prohibited by international acts and permitted by them. At the same time, in the declarations of the World Medical Association (WMA), which specifically regulate the actions of doctors in situations where convicts refuse to take food, “forced feeding” refers to any artificial feeding of a convict carried out against his/her will. In this regard, the inclusion of the term “artificial feeding” in the Penal Code of the Russian Federation without changing the essence of domestic regulation of the problem under consideration is pointless, since such a change will still not ensure compliance of domestic legislation with the WMA recommendations, and the term “artificial feeding” does not fully convey the meaning of the institution established in Part 4 of Article 101 of the Penal Code of the Russian Federation. At the same time, although forced feeding can cause physical and moral suffering to convicts, as well as encroach on the autonomy of their personality, it seems inappropriate to exclude the possibility of forced feeding of convicts from legislation, since the institution of forced feeding in the domestic legal system lets the state fulfil its duty to protect the life and health of persons in penitentiary institutions and achieve the goal of correcting convicts.
Keywords: forced feeding, artificial feeding, nutrition of convicts, international standards, penitentiary medicine, deprivation of liberty, goals of penal legislation.
approaches. Vestnik Sankt-Peterburgskogo universiteta. Pravo = Vestnik of Saint Petersburg University. Law, 2022, no. 1,
pp. 142–157. (In Russ.).
2. Seliverstov V.I. Enhancing the penal legislation in modern conditions: key factors and directions. Penitentsiarnaya nauka
= Penitentiary Science, 2023, vol. 17, no. 1, pp. 19–29. (In Russ.).
3. Zayavlenie MID RF “O zapuske protsedury vykhoda iz Soveta Evropy” ot 15.03.2022 g. [Statement of the Ministry of
Foreign Affairs of the Russian Federation “On launching the procedure for withdrawal from the Council of Europe” of March
15, 2022]. Available at: https://www.mid.ru/tv/?id=1804379&lang=ru (accessed June 29, 2024).
4. Prinuditel’noe pitanie osuzhdennykh k lisheniyu svobody [Forced feeding of persons sentenced to imprisonment].
Moscow, 2018. 175 p.
5. WMA Declaration of Tokyo – Guidelines for Physicians Concerning Torture and other Cruel, Inhuman or Degrading
Treatment or Punishment in Relation to Detention and Imprisonment. Available at: https://www.wma.net/policies-post/
wma-declaration-of-tokyo-guidelines-for-physicians-concerning-torture-and-other-cruel-inhuman-or-degradingtreatment-or-punishment-in-relation-to-detention-and-imprisonment/ (accessed June 9, 2024).
6. WMA Declaration of Malta on Hunger Strikers (revised by the 57th WMA General Assembly, October 2006). Available at:
https://elearning.icrc.org/detention/en/story_content/external_files/Malta%20Declaration.pdf (accessed June 9, 2024).
7. WMA Declaration of Malta on Hunger Strikers (revised by the 68th WMA general Assembly, October 2017). Available at:
https://www.wma.net/policies-post/wma-declaration-of-malta-on-hunger-strikers/ (accessed June 9, 2024).
8. Efremova T.F. Novyi slovar’ russkogo yazyka. Tolkovo-slovoobrazovatel’nyi [New dictionary of the Russian language.
Explanatory and word-formation]. Moscow, 2000. 1,210 p.
9. Elkayam-Levy Cochav. Facing the human rights challenge of prisoners’ and detainees’ hunger strikes at the domestic
level: guidance for policy-makers, government officials, and legal advisors in the management of hunger strikes (September
10, 2015). Harvard International Law Journal, vol. 57, 2015.
10. J Garciá-Guerrero. Hunger-striking in prisons: ethics and the ethical and legal aspects. RevEspSanidPenit, 2013,
no. 15, pp. 8–15.
11. Ruling on the case “H. v. Germany” (1984). In: Britanskii sbornik postanovlenii i reshenii Evropeiskogo suda po pravam
cheloveka EHRR [British collection of judgments and decisions of the European Court of Human Rights]. vol 7. P. 152. (In
Russ.).
12. Postanovlenie po delu “Nevmerzhitskii protiv Ukrainy” (zhaloba No. 54825/00) [Ruling on the case “Nevmerzhitskii
v. Ukraine” (complaint No. 54,825/00)]. Available at: https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng#{“appno”:[“54825/00”],”item
id”:[“001-68715”]} (accessed June 23, 2024).
13. Postanovlenie po delu “Pretti protiv Soedinennogo Korolevstva” (zhaloba No. 5129/03) [Ruling on the case “Pretty
v. the United Kingdom” (complaint No. 5,129/03)]. Available at: https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/ru#{“fulltext”:[“Pretty”]}
(accessed June 23, 2024).
14. Seliverstov V.I. Correction or re-socialization of convicts: dispute about terms or a change in essence. In: Shestoi
Permskii kongress uchenykh-yuristov: Izbrannye materialy [Sixth Perm Congress of Legal scientists: Selected materials].
Moscow, 2016. Pp. 399–409. (In Russ.).
15. Novikov E.E. features of the legal status of convicts, in respect of whom forced feeding is used. Vestnik Samarskogo
yuridicheskogo instituta = Bulletin of the Samara Law Institute. 2018, no. 2 (28), pp. 79–87. (In Russ.).
16. Skiba A.P., Rodionov A.V. Legal status of prisoners sentenced to deprivation of freedom during forced feeding. Pravo.
Zhurnal Vysshei shkoly ekonomiki = Law. Higher School of Economics Journal, 2018, no. 4, pp. 216–234. (In Russ.).
17. Shapovalov V.S. On some aspects of the problem of forced feeding of convicts. In: Aktual’nye voprosy obespecheniya
bezopasnosti ugolovno-ispolnitel’noi sistemy [Current issues of ensuring the security of the penal system]. Pskov, 2021.
Pp. 115–120. (In Russ.).
