Introduction: the article deals with the issues of protection of the rights and freedoms of persons against whom criminal proceedings are carried out to prove them guilty of committing a crime; these issues have always been in the focus of attention of the progressive world community and the legislator. Aims: to analyze the legislation and law enforcement practice of Russia and some other countries in the field of the implementation of the right to protection by persons against whom criminal procedural activities are carried out to prove them guilty of committing a crime, to identify problem issues of a legal nature in this field, and to formulate scientifically substantiated recommendations to address them (minimization). Methods: the dialectical method of scientific knowledge forms the methodological basis of our study. We also use the following methods of scientific cognition: systematic, formal-logical, comparative-legal, etc. Results: the practice of ensuring the right to protection from suspicion or charge, including the decisions of the European Court of Human Rights, shows that not all issues of legal regulation in this area have been resolved to a degree that satisfies science and practice; human rights established by international legal standards are still being violated, the principle of adversarial parties in criminal proceedings is not implemented to the fullest extent, especially in pre-trial proceedings. Discussion: currently, the following issues are debatable: about the possibility of participation of the defender before an official suspicion or charge is brought against the person in an initiated criminal case (from the moment of the beginning of the implementation of procedural actions against a person, aimed at verifying the report of a crime and the involvement of the person in the commission of this crime, before the initiation of a criminal case, as well as from the moment of the implementation of a procedural action in an initiated criminal case affecting the rights and freedoms of the person against whom it is being carried out, and aimed at proving them guilty of committing the crime); about the possible participation of another person as a defender upon the request of the defendant, as well as the scope of the requirements such persons should comply with, and a set of criteria, according to which a decision should be made to allow the individual who does not have the status of defense attorney to act as a defender. Conclusions: based on the results of the study, we formulate proposals for improving the criminal procedure legislation aimed at expanding the scope of possible participation of a defender in criminal proceedings at the stage before the official suspicion or charge is brought, and determining the procedure for considering applications for allowing other persons who do not have the status of defense attorney to act as a defender.
Keywords: Criminal prosecution; defender; defense attorney; petition
Candidate of Sciences (Law), Associate Professor, associate professor at the Department of Law Enforcement Activity, Criminal Law and Process, Pskov State University, Pskov, Russian Federation.
ORCID 0000- 0003-3496-801
, e-mail firstname.lastname@example.org
Candidate of Sciences (Law), associate professor at the Department of Regime and Intelligence-Gathering Activities in the Penal System, Pskov Branch of the Academy of the Federal Penitentiary Service of Russia, Pskov, Russian Federation.
, e-mail email@example.com
1. Avdeev V.N., Voskoboynik I.O. On participation of defense counsel in course of receipt of explanations and performance of other procedural actions at participation of person notification of whose crime is verified. Advokatskaya praktika=Advocate’s Practice, 2017, no. 3, pp. 32–37. (In Russ.).
2. Agabekov K.S. On the beginning of criminal prosecution in the conditions of protective justice. Mirovoi sud’ya=Justice of the Peace, 2019, no. 1, pp. 14–18. (In Russ.).
3. Baeva N.A. International legal and constitutional standards for the protection of citizens’ rights and interests in criminal proceedings. Sudebnaya vlast’ i ugolovnyi protsess=Judicial Authority and Criminal Process, 2018, no. 4, pp. 60–67. (In
4. Bulatov B.B. Protsessual’noe polozhenie lits, v otnoshenii kotorykh osushchestvlyaetsya obvinitel’naya deyatel’nost’: avtoreferat dissertatsii na soiskanie uchenoi stepeni kandidata yuridicheskikh nauk [Procedural position of the persons
subject of the indictment activity: Candidate of Sciences (Law) dissertation abstract]. Omsk, 2011. 26 p.
5. Voltornist O.A. Issues of exercising the right to defense amid the explanations of the Plenum of the Supreme Court of the Russian Federation. Vestnik Omskoi yuridicheskoi akademii=Siberian Law Review, 2016, no. 2, pp. 56–59. (In Russ.).
6. Vrazhnov A.S. Challenging situations for an attorney for the defense on criminal case initiation and preliminary investigation stages. Advokatskaya praktika=Advocate’s Practice, 2019, no. 2, pp. 31–34. (In Russ.).
7. Grinenko A.V. Parity of rights of parties in pre-trial criminal procedure. Advokatskaya praktika=Advocate’s Practice, 2017, no. 4, pp. 35–40. (In Russ.).
8. Davletov A.A. The problem of defining a status of criminally prosecuted person in the stage of institution of a criminal case. Rossiiskii yuridicheskii zhurnal=Russian Juridical Journal, 2015, no. 4, pp. 61–67. (In Russ.).
9. Endol’tseva A.V. Exercising of the constitutional right to receive qualified legal assistance in Russian criminal proceedings. Ugolovnoe sudoproizvodstvo=Criminal Judicial Proceeding, 2019, no. 4, pp. 25–30. (In Russ.).
10. Larin E.G. Admission of a person who is not a lawyer as a defender at the stage of preliminary investigation: legislation and practice. Zakonodatel’stvo i praktika=Legislation and Practice, 2010, no. 2, pp. 21–24. (In Russ.).
11. Nikolyuk V.V., Bezrukov S. S. Conceptual and applied issues related to the resolution of the Plenum of the Supreme Court of the Russian Federation on the application of the norms on the right to protection. Ugolovnyi protsess=Criminal
Process, 2015, no. 8, pp. 26–33. (In Russ.).
12. On amendments to Articles 62 and 303 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation and the Criminal Procedure Code of the Russian Federation: Federal Law 23-FZ of March 4, 2013. In: Sobranie zakonodatel’stva Rossiiskoi Federatsii
[Collection of Legislation of the Russian Federation]. 2013. No. 9. Article 875. (In Russ.).
13. On amendments to the Criminal Procedure Code of the Russian Federation: Federal Law 73-FZ of April 17, 2017. In: Sobranie zakonodatel’stva Rossiiskoi Federatsii [Collection of Legislation of the Russian Federation]. 2017. No. 17. Article
2455. (In Russ.).
14. Ovsyannikov I.V. Actions and decisions taken at the initial stage of pre-trial proceedings to be legal as well. Zakonnost’=Legality, 2017, no. 4, pp. 45–49. (In Russ.).
15. Ovchinnikov Yu.G., Kuzora S.A. Problems of participation of the “other” person as a defender in the pre-trial stages of criminal proceedings Rossiiskaya yustitsiya=Russian Justice, 2014, no. 11, pp. 43–44. (In Russ.).
16. In the case of checking the constitutionality of Part Four of Article 47 of the Criminal Procedure Code of the RSFSR in connection with the complaints of citizens B.V. Antipov, R.L. Gitis and S.V. Abramov: Resolution of the Constitutional Court of the Russian Federation of January 28, 1997 no. 2-P. In: Sobranie zakonodatel’stva Rossiiskoi Federatsii [Collection of Legislation of the Russian Federation]. 1997. No. 7. Article 871. (In Russ.).
17. Reznik G.M. To the issue concerning the constitutional content of the term “qualified legal assistance”. Advokat=Lawyer, 2007, no. 4, pp. 25–27. (In Russ.).
18. Skoba E.V. Realizatsiya konstitutsionnogo prava na kvalifitsirovannuyu yuridicheskuyu pomoshch’ v dosudebnom proizvodstve po ugolovnym delam: avtoreferat dissertatsii na soiskanie uchenoi stepeni kandidata yuridicheskikh nauk
[Implementation of the constitutional right to qualified legal assistance in pre-trial proceedings in criminal cases: Candidate of Sciences (Law) dissertation abstract]. Moscow, 2010. 28 p.
19. Khimicheva G.P. On the issue of correcting the principle of presumption of innocence. Vestnik ekonomicheskoi bezopasnosti=Bulletin of Economic Security, 2016, no. 5, pp. 83–86. (In Russ.).
20. Khimicheva O.V., Sharov D.V. Some aspects of ensuring the rights of a person when detained on suspicion of committing a crime. Zakony Rossii: opyt, analiz, praktika=Laws of Russia: Experience, Analysis, Practice, 2018, no. 5, pp. 56–61. (In Russ.).
21. Asmat S.M., Nurmaganbet E.T. Provision of qualified legal aid defence counsel to the suspect and accused persons. Bulletin d’EUROTALENT-FIDJIP, 2015, no 8, pp. 66–70.
22. Belanger A., Brock B.J. The practice of criminal defence: Why we fight and defend those most imperilled, every day. International Journal of Public Law and Policy, 2012, vol. 2, no. 4, pp. 352–356.
23. Kogamov A.M. Juridical personality of a defense lawyer in the context of international contractual and other obligations of the republic of Kazakhstan in criminal practice. World Applied Sciences Journal, 2013, vol. 26, no. 8, pp. 1094–1099.
24. Temminck Tuinstra J.P.W. Assisting an accused to represent himself: appointment of amici curiae as the most appropriate option. Journal of International Criminal Justice, 2006, vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 47–63.
25. Tynybekov S., Nurmaganbet E.T., Duysenova L.M. The concept, value, and the procedural position of defense attorney at the preliminary investigation. Life Science Journal, 2014, vol. 11, special issue 5, pp. 239–247.