Journal section JURISPRUDENCE
Criminal law and penal aspects of the application of the suspension of sentence
The article comprehensively examined the problematic issues related to the suspension
of criminal sentence, and also analyzes the practical difficulties of implementing
the suspension of criminal sentence, provides a brief historical background on the
development of the institution of suspension of criminal sentence in domestic criminal
law. The author identifies not only positive, but also negative conditions that can change
the content of the institution of suspension of criminal sentence. Based on a study of
the statistical data of the Judicial Department under the Supreme Court of the Russian
Federation on the appointment of a suspension of criminal sentence and its cancellation
as well as the data of the Federal Penal Service of Russia on convicts registered in the
penal inspections with a suspension of criminal sentence, it is proposed to classify the
suspension of criminal sentence by the time of its application (at the stage of sentencing
the court, with subsequent release from the actual serving of the sentence and at the
stage of the execution of the court sentence), the issue of the application of suspension of
criminal sentence to convicts who have adopted children or who have taken them under
their guardianship. There is is substantiated expediency of considering convicts, to whom
suspension of criminal sentence is applied, evading from raising a child, if they have been
subjected to administrative responsibility for violation of public order two or more times a
year.
Keywords: suspension of criminal sentence; penal inspections; convicted drug addicts; convicted pregnant women
Рerson attached to the Federal State Budgetary Educational Institution of Higher Education “Russian State University of Justice” for the preparation of a dissertation for the degree of PhD. in Law, Senior Inspector of branch No. 17 of the Federal State Institution the Penal Inspection of Russia in Moscow Region.
, e-mail natal-ya@bk.ru
-
1. Denisova A. V. Kriterii korrektnosti ugolovno-pravovyh norm [Criteria for the correctness of criminal law]. Rossijskaya
yusticiya – Russian justice, 2017, no. 11, pp. 21–24. (In Russ.).
2. Krasil’nikova M. S. Nekotorye voprosy ugolovno-pravovogo regulirovaniya otsrochki otbyvaniya nakazaniya (st. 82 UK
RF) [Some issues of the criminal law regulation of deferment of punishment (Article 82 of the Criminal Code of the Russian
Federation)]. Vestnik Kemerovskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta – Bulletin of the Kemerovo State University, 2013,
no. 4 (56), pp. 273–277. (In Russ.).
yusticiya – Russian justice, 2017, no. 11, pp. 21–24. (In Russ.).
2. Krasil’nikova M. S. Nekotorye voprosy ugolovno-pravovogo regulirovaniya otsrochki otbyvaniya nakazaniya (st. 82 UK
RF) [Some issues of the criminal law regulation of deferment of punishment (Article 82 of the Criminal Code of the Russian
Federation)]. Vestnik Kemerovskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta – Bulletin of the Kemerovo State University, 2013,
no. 4 (56), pp. 273–277. (In Russ.).