Changing the Category of Crime by the Court as a Means to Individualize Imposition of Criminal Punishment
Babayants E. A. Changing the category of crime by the court as a means to individualize imposition of criminal punishment. Penitentiary Science, 2022, vol. 16, no. 3 (59), pp. 263–273. doi: 10.46741/2686-9764.2022.59.3.004
Introduction: the article discusses the procedure and grounds for changing the category of crime by the court to a less serious one in conditions where there are reasons for applying the specified norm to individualize punishment. The norm of Part 6 of Article 15 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation is often criticized in literature and is the subject of specialists’ discussion. Purpose: based on the analysis of scientific literature and judicial practice, to show the possibilities of punishment individualization by recognizing a crime less grave in accordance with the provisions of Part 6 of Article 15 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation. Methods: historical, comparative legal, statistical, empirical methods of description, interpretation; theoretical methods of formal and dialectical logic. The following private scientific methods were used: the legal-dogmatic and the method of interpretation of legal norms. Results: the work conducted reveals researchers’ opinions about redundancy of the norm regulating the change in the category of crime. Nevertheless, this rule should be recognized as necessary, as it entitles the court to make the right decision in non-standard situations. The rule under study may be used to individualize punishment for members of organized criminal groups, depending on their degree of involvement in criminal activity and the public danger of their actions. Conclusions: to promote individualization of punishments in the domestic criminal law, it is necessary to expand the possibilities of applying Part 6 of Article 15 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation, having supplemented the Resolution of the Plenum of the Supreme Court of the Russian Federation with an appropriate paragraph providing for the application of this norm when considering cases in a special order in connection with the conclusion of a pre-trial cooperation agreement with the defendant.
Keywords: Criminal legislation; changing the category of crime; categories of crimes; punishment individualization; public danger of crime
2. Asadueva S.A. The importance of the institution of a pre-trial agreement on cooperation in criminal proceedings. Zakon i parvo=Law and Legislation, 2021, no. 6, pp. 54–59. (In
Russ.).
3. Ashirbekov A. According to the principle of individualization of punishment. zakon.kz: sait [zakon.kz: website] Available at: https://www.zakon.kz/4911883-po-printsipuindividualizatsii.html (In Russ.). (Accessed May 5, 2022).
4. Bezlepkin B.T. Kommentarii k Ugolovno-protsessual’nomu kodeksu Rossiiskoi Federatsii (postateinyi) [Commentary on the Criminal Procedural Code of the Russian
Federation (article-by-article)]. Moscow: Prospekt. 2016. 576 p. ISBN 978-5-392-32847-5.
5. Gerasimov A.M. Criminal law policy to increase the role of the court in establishing the level of public danger of crime. Pravovaya politika i pravovaya zhizn’=Legal Policy and
Legal Life, 2022, no. 1, pp. 55–59. (In Russ.).
6. Dyad’kin D.S. Criminal and legal problems of application of Article 15, Part 6 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation. Ugolovnoe pravo=Criminal Law, 2015, no. 2, pp.
23–28. (In Russ.).
7. Korotkov S.A. Criminal community (criminal organization) and responsibility of their participants under Russian criminal law. Akademicheskaya mysl’=Academic Thought,
2020, no. 2 (11), pp. 77–84. (In Russ.).
8. Kuleva L.O. Kategorizatsiya prestuplenii kak sredstvo differentsiatsii otvetstvennosti v Obshchei i Osobennoi chastyakh UK RF: avtoreferat dissertatsii kandidata yuridicheskikh
nauk [Categorization of crimes as a means of differentiating liability in the General and Special parts of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation: Candidate of Sciences (Law) dissertation abstract]. Yaroslavl, 2019. 244 p.
9. In the direction of humanization: the Plenum of the Supreme Court clarified how to mitigate punishment through retraining. Pravo.ru: sait [Pravo.ru: website]. Available at:
https://pravo.ru/news/202505/ (In Russ.). (Accessed May 5, 2022).
10. On the practice of courts’ application of a special procedure for court proceedings when concluding a pre-trial cooperation agreement: Resolution of the Plenum of the Supreme Court of the Russian Federation No. 16 of June 28, 2012. Rossiiskaya gazeta=Russian Newspaper, 2012, no. 156. (In Russ.).
11. On the practice of courts’ application of the provisions of Part 6 of Article 15 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation: Resolution of the Plenum of the Supreme Court No. 10 of May 15, 2018. Rossiiskaya gazeta=Russian Newspaper, no. 106, 2018. (In Russ.).
12. Resolution of the Constitutional Court of the Russian Federation No. 16-P of May 20, 2014 on the case of checking the constitutionality of Paragraph 1 of Part 3 of Article 31 of the Criminal Procedural Code of the Russian Federation in connection with the complaint of citizen V.A. Filimonov. In: Sobranie zakonodatel’stva Rossiiskoi Federatsii [Collection of legislation of the Russian Federation]. 2014. No. 22. Art. 2920. (In Russ.).
13. Verdict of the Privokzalnii District Court of the city of Tula of January 21, 2020 in the case No. 1-196/2019. Sudebnye i normativnye akty RF: sait [Judicial and regulatory acts of the Russian Federation: website]. Available at: https://sudact.ru/regular/doc/lGRb5goMxML1/?ysclid=l7fxv7mexz786365480 (In Russ.). (Accessed May 5, 2022).
14. Verdict of the Sverdlovsk District Court of the city of Belgorod of July 23, 2020 in the case No. 1-122/2020. Sudebnye i normativnye akty RF: sait [Judicial and regulatory acts of the Russian Federation: website]. Available at: https://sudact.ru/regular/doc/qwbohF8UPc6q/?ysclid=l7fxwcxejo962493303 (In Russ.). (Accessed May 5, 2022).
15. Verdict of the Tuapse District Court of Krasnodar Krai of May 19, 2020 in the case No. 1-60/2020. Sudebnye i normativnye akty RF: sait [Judicial and regulatory acts of the Russian Federation: website]. Available at: https://sudact.ru/regular/doc/y1fizbweGmLW/?ysclid=l7fxx5sm8g565692349 (In Russ.). (Accessed May 5, 2022).
16. Verdict of the Chita Garrison Military Court (Zabaikalsky Krai) of May 8, 2020 in the case No. 1-52/2020. Sudebnye i normativnye akty RF: sait [Judicial and regulatory acts of the Russian Federation: website]. Available at: https://sudact.ru/regular/doc/jrr45eQuAndK/?ysclid=l7fxxzsg6r962406711 (In Russ.). (Accessed May 5, 2022).
17. Verdict of the Yashkul District Court of the Republic of Kalmykia of July 21, 2021 in the case No. 1-60/2021. Sudebnye i normativnye akty RF: sait [Judicial and regulatory acts of the Russian Federation: website]. Available at: https://sudact.ru/regular/doc/wVAXCV2XVCoT/?ysclid=l7fxypizc7513765155 (In Russ.). (Accessed May 5, 2022).
18. Pudovochkin Yu.E., Genrikh N.V. Changes of category of crime by the court: theoretical applied analysis. Nauchnyi vestnik Omskoi akademii MVD Rossii=Scientific Bulletin of the Omsk Academy of the MIA of Russia, 2019, no. 2 (73), pp. 76–81. (In Russ.).
19. Pudovochkin Yu.E. Uchenie o prestuplenii: izbrannye lektsii [Doctrine of crime: selected lectures]. Moscow: Yurlitinform. 2008. 224 p. ISBN 978-5-93295-654-0.
20. Reshetnik V.Ya. Taking decisions by courts on changing a category of crime for a minor crime. Zakonnost’= Legality, 2016, no. 9 (983), pp. 65–76. (In Russ.).
21. Sakaeva E.Z., Musina E.E. Concept of plea agreement. Interaktivnaya nauka=Interactive Science, 2021, no. 3 (58), pp. 85–89. (In Russ.).
22. Judicial statistics of the Judicial Department at the Supreme Court of the Russian Federation. Sudebnyi departament pri Verkhovnom Sude Rossiiskoi Federatsii: ofitsial’nyi cait [Judicial Department at the Supreme Court of the Russian Federation: official website]. Available at: http://www.cdep.ru/index.php?id=79&item=5671 (In Russ.). (Accessed May
5, 2022).
23. Criminal Code of the Kyrgyz Republic No. 127 of October 28, 2021 (with amendments and additions as of April 1, 2022). 25-YuRIST: sait [25-Law: website]. Available at: https://
online.zakon.kz/Document/?doc_id=36675065 (In Russ.). (Accessed May 5, 2022).
24. Criminal Code of the Republic of Kazakhstan No. 226-V of July 3, 2014 (with amendments and additions as of March 2, 2022). 25-YuRIST: sait [25-Law: website]. Available at: https://online.zakon.kz/Document/?doc_id=31575252 (In Russ.). (Accessed May 5, 2022).
25. Yankovskii D. A. Features of sentencing for a crime committed by a group of persons, a group of persons by prior agreement, an organized group and a criminal community. Probely v rossiiskom zakonodatel’stve=Gaps in Russian Legislation, 2015, no. 3, pp. 116–123. (In Russ.).
26. Bagaric M., Svilar J. A (partial and principled) defense of sentences of life imprisonment. Cleveland State Law Review, 2022, vol. 70, no. 4, pp. 667–708. Available at: https://
engagedscholarship.csuohio.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=4182&context=clevstlrev (accessed May 5, 2022).
27. Johnson T. Lying at plea bargaining. Georgia State University Law Review, 2022, vol. 38, no. 3, pр. 673–733. Available at: https://readingroom.law.gsu.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=3139&context=gsulr (accessed May 5, 2022).
28. Meixner J.B. Jr. Modern sentencing mitigation. Northwestern University Law Review, 2022, vol. 116, no 6. pр. 1395–1480. Available at: https://scholarlycommons.law.northwestern.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1490&context=nulr (accessed May 5, 2022).
29. Ramsey J. Minimum sentences, maximum suffering: a proposal to reform mandatory minimum sentencing. Scholars Crossing. The institutional repository of Liberty University:
website. Available at: https://digitalcommons.liberty.edu/hsgconference/2022/theory_philosophy/16 (accessed May 5, 2022).
30. Reed K., Franz A., Calderon V., Meschkow A. et al. Reported experiences with plea bargaining: a theoretical analysis of the legal standard. West Virginia Law Review, 2022, vol. 124, no 2, pр. 421–447. Available at: https://researchrepository.wvu.edu/wvlr/vol124/iss2/5/ (accessed May 5, 2022).
