Study relevance: significance of social environment of a minor for adaptation and overcoming difficult life situations is substantiated. It is shown that social environment exerts a psychosocial influence, forming minors’ ideas of themselves and their self-esteem. The role of minors’ social environment in various areas of social interaction is studied and importance of criminals’ social ties for inducing crime and forming criminal ideology is shown. Besides, the impact of social ties on prevention and suppression of adolescents’ crimes is proven. At the same time, the influence of a criminal subculture on establishment of relations with social environment remains insufficiently studied. In particular, the subculture impact on changing minors’ ideas about interaction with other people and social groups is unclear. Understanding this will allow us to assess a degree of negative influence of a criminal subculture on minors. Study purpose: to identify social ties of juvenile offenders who share criminal subculture values, including by comparing with similar characteristics of law-abiding minors. Methods: the method of data collection is a questionnaire describing parameters of social relations, such as volume, stability, homogeneity, subordination and reference. Procedures of descriptive statistics and a nonparametric analogue of one-way analysis of variance (Kraskel-Wallis H-test) are used as methods for processing acquired results. The study sample consists of 229 people aged 13–17, 64.6% of whom are male, 91 of the surveyed are either convicted of crimes or are attending specialized institutions. The rest of the sample (138 people) is characterized by law-abiding behavior; during the survey period they are not suspected or accused. Results and novelty: new data on the specifics of social ties of the delinquent youth are received, in particular, small volume of relations, homogeneity of participants, low reference of social environment; prospects for studying social ties under conditions of social regulation of interaction with regard to gender and socio-cultural specifics are determined.
Keywords: Crime prevention; social environment; criminal subculture; social isolation; self-esteem.
Candidate of Sciences (Psychology), Associate Professor, Doctoral Candidate of the Ural State Pedagogical University, Yekaterinburg, Russia
, e-mail email@example.com
1. Barabanov N.P. Criminological and psychological aspects of the criminal ideology and way of life in the criminal subculture of convicts. Chelovek: prestuplenie i nakazanie=Man: Crime and Punishment, 2017, vol. 25(1–4), no. 2, pp. 177–182. (In Russ.).
2. Blokhina M.V., Grigor’ev L.G. Molodezhnye subkul’tury v sovremennom obshchestve: monografiya [Youth subcultures in modern society: monograph]. Tver: TGTU, 2004. 127 p.
3. Dz’onik D.V., Rozhkov A.A. Socio-psychological features of communities sharing the psychology of “AUE”. In: Pedagogika i psikhologiya v deyatel’nosti sotrudnikov pravookhranitel’nykh organov: integratsiya teorii i praktiki: materialy Vserossiiskoi nauchno-prakticheskoi konferentsii [Pedagogy and psychology in the activities of law enforcement officers: integration of theory and practice: materials of the All-Russian scientific and practice conference]. Saint Petersburg: S.-Peterb. un-t MVD Rossii, 2020. Pp. 135–139. (In Russ.).
4. Koshenova M.I., Krayushkina E.A. Perceptions of adolescents of the “risk group”: about criminal subculture as an identity resource. PEM: Psychology. Educology. Medicine, 2019, no. 1, pp. 91–118. (In Russ.).
5. Kudryashov M.A. Subculture and after it: history of the fundamental concept of the youth research. Etnograficheskoe obozrenie=Ethnographic Review, 2014, no. 1, pp. 23–32. (In Russ.).
6. Lesin A.V., Il’icheva N.A., Fomina N.V. Reference relations in the structure of communication of adolescents. Mezhdunarodnyi studencheskii nauchnyi vestnik=European Student Scientific Journal, 2016, no. 5-1, pp. 113–114. Available at: https://eduherald.ru/ru/article/view?id=15344 (In Russ.). (Accessed November 15, 2021).
7. Matskevich I.M. Criminal subculture. Rossiiskoe pravo v Internete= Russian Law on the Internet, 2005, no. 1. Available at: https://www.twirpx.com/file/742088/ (In Russ.). (Accessed November 1, 2021).
8. Merton R. Social structure and anomie. In: Sotsiologiya prestupnosti (Sovremennye burzhuaznye teorii) [Sociology of crime (Modern bourgeois theories)]. Moscow: Progress, 1966. Pp. 299–313. (In Russ.).
9. Pleshchitsa S.G. Osnovy konfliktologii [Fundamentals of conflictology]. Saint Petersburg: Izd-vo SPbGUEF, 2012. 229 p.
10. Sotsial’nyi portret prestupnosti: portal pravovoi statistiki. General’naya prokuratura Rossiiskoi Federatsii: ofitsial’nyi sait [Prosecutor General’s Office of the Russian Federation: official website]. Available at: http://crimestat.ru/social_portrait (In Russ.). (Accessed November 3, 2021).
11. Sochivko D.V., Polyanin N.A. Molodezh’ Rossii: obrazovatel’nye sistemy, subkul’tury, ispravitel’nye uchrezhdeniya: uchebno-metodicheskoe posobie [Youth of Russia: educational systems, subcultures, correctional institutions: teacher edition]. Moscow: MPSI, 2009. 264 p.
12. Fedoseeva A.A. Kriminal’naya subkul’tura kak agent sotsializatsii molodezhi: avtoreferat dissertatsii na soiskanie uchenoi stepeni kandidata sotsiologicheskikh nauk [Criminal subculture as an agent of socialization of the youth: Candidate of Sciences (Sociology) dissertation abstract]. Maikop, 2012. 28 p.
13. Shpak S.V. Kriminal’naya subkul’tura molodezhi v sovremennom rossiiskom obshchestve: tendentsii formirovaniya i rasprostraneniya: avtoreferat dissertatsii na soiskanie uchenoi stepeni kandidata filosofskikh nauk [Criminal subculture of the youth in modern Russian society: trends of formation and dissemination: Candidate of Sciences (Philosophy) dissertation abstract]. Krasnodar, 2012. 31 p.
14. Shchedrina E.V. Significant social circle and the basics of its experimental identification. In: Sotsial’no-psikhologicheskie problemy formirovaniya lichnosti i uchebnovospitatel’nogo kollektiva [Socio-psychological problems of personality formation and educational staff]. Moscow, 1975. Pp. 61–70. (In Russ.).
15. Bartlett R., Holditch-Davis D., Belyea M. Clusters of problem behaviors in adolescents. Journal of Pediatric Nursing, 2007, no. 33(1), pp. 13–18. DOI:10.1002/nur.20078.
16. Bichler G., Malm A., Coope T. Drug supply networks: a systematic review of the organizational structure of illicit drug trade. Crime Science, 2017, no. 6(2), pp. 1–23. DOI: 10.1186/s40163-017-0063-3.
17. Brookmeyer K.A., Fanti K.A., Henrich C.C. Schools, parents, and the youth violence: a multilevel, ecological analysis. Journal of Clinical Child and Adolescent Psychology, 2006, vol.35 (4), pp. 504–514. DOI:10.1207/s15374424jccp3504_2.
18. Burk W. J., Laursen B. Adolescent perceptions of friendship and their associations with individual adjustment. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 2005, vol.29, pp. 156–164. DOI: 10.1080/01650250444000342.
19. Clark J.L., Algoe S.B., Green M.C. Social network sites and well-being: the role of social connection. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 2018, no. 27, pp. 32–37. DOI: 10.1177/0963721417730833.
20. Haynie D.L. Friendship networks and delinquency: the relative nature of peer delinquency. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 2002, no. 18, pp. 99–134. DOI: 10.1023/A:1015227414929.
21. Papachristos A.V. The network structure of crime. Sociology Compass, 2014, no. 8(4), pp. 347–357. DOI: 10.1111/soc4.12147.
22. Roman C.G., Cahill M., Mayes L.R. Changes in personal social networks across individuals leaving their street gang: just what are the youth leaving behind? Social Sciences, 2021, vol. 10 (39), pp. 1–22. DOI: 10.3390/socsci10020039.
23. Shoemaker D.J. Theories of delinquency: an examination of explanations of delinquent behavior. Oxford University Press: New York, 1996. 218 p.
24. Tabassum S., Pereira F.S.F., Fernandes S., Gama J. Social network analysis: an overview. WIREs Data Mining and Knowledge Discovery, 2018, no. 8 (5), pp. 71–74. DOI: 10.1002/widm.1256.
25. Valente T.W. Ego and personal networks effect. Social networks and health: models, methods, and applications. New York: Oxford University Press, 2010. Pp. 61–80.
26. Zlokazov K.V., Tagiltseva Y.R. The youth notion about social space: interactive, reflective, and receptive components. In: Advances in social science, education and humanities research: proceedings of the International Scientific Conference “Digitalization of Education: History, Trends and Prospects” (DETP 2020). Ekaterinburg: Atlantis Press, 2020. Pp. 614–620. DOI 10.2991/assehr.k.200509.111.
27. Zwecker N.A., Harrison A.J., Welty L.J., Teplin L.A., Abram K.M. Social support networks among delinquent youth: an 8-year follow–up study. Journal of Offender Rehabilitation, 2018, no. 57 (7), pp. 459–480. DOI: 10.1080/10509674.2018.1523821.