The Use of Psychological Correction Programs to Improve the Occupational Fitness of Correctional Personnel
Minina I.N., Gribanova D.Ya. The use of psychological correction programs to improve the occupational fitness of correctional personnel. Penitentiary Science, 2021, vol. 15, no. 3 (55), pp. 669-676. DOI 10.46741/2686-9764-2021-15-3-669-676.
Introduction: the article examines the results of the application of a short-term psychological correction program, which includes conflict prevention and the development of adaptive behavior skills in difficult communication situations. Aim: based on the results of the study, to identify conditions for the effective use of psychological programs to overcome stress among prison staff. Methods: the tasks set in the work were solved with the help of general scientific research methods within the framework of comparative, statistical and logical analysis and empirical methods such as description and interpretation of the information. The study involved 80 employees of the security department of correctional institutions of the Pskov Oblast, divided into experimental and control groups. The trainings were conducted by full-time psychologists of the departments. To assess the effectiveness, we used the following methods: “Willpower self-assessment scale” by N.N. Obozov, the technique for determining the level of neuropsychic stability “Forecast”, and the questionnaire of interpersonal relations in the adaptation of W. Shchutz. Results: the analysis of the data with the help of mathematical statistics methods has shown that the use of such programs is advisable among employees included in the group of increased attention. These may be persons conditionally recommended for this type of activity, as well as those who have been subjected to the deforming influence of an unfavorable professional environment. A statistically significant result for the experimental group of subjects consisted in a change in the indicators on the sincerity scale, which can mean an increase in self-esteem, trust in the psychologist and the desire to answer the questions honestly. The greatest effectiveness of the training was observed when we were implementing the tested program; this is explained by increased motivation and responsibility for its results. No practical effect of participation in the training was revealed among the personnel who initially had indicators that did not require correction. Conclusions: in order to increase the effectiveness of trainings, it is necessary that psychologists have personal conscious motivation when they work out unique programs that take into account actual needs of correctional staff.
Keywords: psychological correction program; psychological support of personnel; willpower; stress; mental stability; training; group of increased attention.
2. Debol’skii M.G. Psychological service of the penal system of Russia: the experience of organization. Rossiiskii psikhologicheskii zhurnal=Russian Psychological Journal, 2004, no. 1, pp. 119–130. Available at: https://www.elibrary.ru/ download/elibrary_16344754_14186837.pdf (accessed July 12, 2020). (In Russian).
3. Kokorina E.I. Professional psychological suitability of candidates for service in the penal system. NovaInfo.Ru, 2017, no. 65, pp. 444–447. Available at: https://novainfo.ru/pdf/065-1.pdf (accessed July 12, 2020). (In Russian).
4. Korzunin A.V. Psikhofiziologicheskie kriterii otsenki nervno-psikhicheskoi ustoichivosti v protsesse voennoprofessional’noi adaptatsii voennosluzhashchikh: avtoreferat dissertatsii na soiskanie uchenoi stepeni kandidata meditsinskikh nauk [Psychophysiological criteria for the assessment of neuropsychological stability in the process of military professional adaptation: Candidate of Sciences (Medicine) dissertation abstract]. Saint Petersburg, 2015. 24 p.
5. Krasnenkova S.A. On the issue of the current state of psychological correction work in penitentiary practice. Prikladnaya yuridicheskaya psikhologiya=Applied Legal Psychology, 2008, no. 4, pp. 93–98. (In Russ.).
6. Myagkov A.Yu. Falsehood scales: the attempt of sociological reinterpretation. Vestnik IGEU=Vestnik of Ivanovo State Power University, 2006, no. 1, pp. 66–73. Available at: https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/shkaly-lzhi-opyt-sotsiologicheskoyreinterpretatsii (accessed July 13, 2020). (In Russ.).
7. Ovcharova E.V. Modern psychological correction and psychotherapeutic directions in the work of penitentiary psychologists. In: Psikhologiya XXI veka: vyzovy, poiski, vektory razvitiya: tezisy dokladov vserossiiskogo simpoziuma psikhologov (Ryazan’, 5 aprelya 2019 g.) [Psychology of the 21st century: challenges, search, vectors of development: Abstracts of the All-Russian Symposium of Psychologists (Ryazan, April 5, 2019)]. Ryazan: Akademiya FSIN Rossii, 2019. Pp. 125–129. Available at: https://www.elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=37275422& (accessed July 17, 2020). (In Russ.).
8. Features of the organization and prospects for the development of psychological work with the personnel of the penal system within the framework of the implementation of the provisions of the Concept for development of the penal system of the Russian Federation until 2020: decision of the Board of the Federal Penitentiary Service of Russia. In: Ob ob”yavlenii reshenii kollegii Federal’noi sluzhby ispolneniya nakazanii: prikaz FSIN Rossii ot 07.12.2012 [On the announcement of decisions of the boards of the Federal Penitentiary Service: Order of FSIN Russia dated December 7, 2012]. (In Russ.).
9. Fedorova E.M. The main forms and methods of psychological prevention and correction of professional destruction of correctional personnel. Vedomosti ugolovno-ispolnitel’noi sistemy=News of the Penal System, 2016, no. 4 (167), pp. 34– 39. Available at: https://www.elibrary.ru/download/elibrary_26470782_20126321.pdf (accessed July 10, 2020). (In Russ.).
10. Cherkasova M.A. Psikhologicheskii monitoring professional’nogo vygoraniya sotrudnikov UIS Rossii: dissertatsiya na soiskanie uchenoi stepeni kandidata psikhologicheskikh nauk: 19.00.06 [Psychological monitoring of professional burnout of employees the penal system of Russia: Candidate of Sciences (Psychology) dissertation]. Vologda, 2014. 187 p.
11. Jiang S., Lambert E.G., Liu J., Zhang J. An exploratory study of the effects of work environment variables on job satisfaction among Chinese prison staff. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 2018, vol. 62 (6), pp. 1694–1719.
12. Blau Ju.R., Light S.C., Chamlin M. Individual and contextual effects on stress and job satisfaction: a study of prison staff. Work and Occupations, 1986, vol. 13(1), pp. 131–156. DOI: 10.1177/0730888486013001009.
13. Ellison J. M., Caudill J.W. Working on local time: testing the job-demand-control-support model of stress with jail officers. Journal of Criminal Justice, 2020, vol. 70 (C). DOI: 10.1016 / j.jcrimjus.2020.101717.
14. Finn P. Addressing correctional officer stress: programs and strategies. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice. 2000. Available at: https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED449457.pdf (accessed January 9, 2021).
15. Sygit-Kowalkowska E., Poklek R., Pastwa-Wojciechowska B. Predicting the role of personality traits, organizational factors, and strategies for coping with stress in job satisfaction in correctional services. Polish Psychological Bulletin, 2020, vol. 50, pp. 275–283. DOI: 10.24425/ppb.2019.130701.
16. Steiner B., Wooldredge J. Individual and environmental sources of work stress among prison officers. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 2015, vol. 42 (8), pр. 800–818. DOI: 10.1177 / 0093854814564463.
17. Elliot D., Kuehl K., El Ghaziri M., Cherniack M. Stress and corrections: addressing the safety and well-being of correctional officers. Corrections Today, 2015, vol. 77 (4), pp. 40–44. 18. Wolfe S.E., Lawson S.G. The organizational justice effect among criminal justice employees: a metăanalysis. Criminology, 2020, vol. 58 (2). DOI: 10.1111 / 1745-9125.12251.
