Punishment of Persons Convicted of Economic (Business) Crimes and Malfeasance in Office, in the Assessment of the Public and Professionals
Seliverstov V.I. Punishment of persons convicted of economic (business) crimes and malfeasance in office, in the assessment of the public and professionals. Penitentiary Science, 2021, vol. 15, no. 3 (55), pp. 613-620. DOI 10.46741/2686-9764-2021-15-3-613-620.
Introduction: the article considers ultra-liberal, ultra-radical and realistic views on the punishment of persons convicted of economic (business) crimes and malfeasance in office. The article analyzes public and professional opinion on this problem using the results of specific sociological studies conducted in 2018–2019 by Tkachevsky Research and Education Center “Problems of Penal Law” under Lomonosov Moscow State University. Research materials and methods: the research is based on the application of the specific sociological research method. The materials for our research include the results of the study of public and professional opinion on the punishment of those convicted of economic crimes and malfeasance in office, and on the places and conditions of their imprisonment. Empirical research includes surveys of three types of respondents: citizens of the Russian Federation; persons convicted of economic crimes and malfeasance in office who are serving sentences in correctional institutions; correctional officers. We also investigate proposals on sending the convicts under consideration to correctional institutions located in remote regions of Russia, and the prospects for the construction and opening of so-called private prisons for them. We analyze the practice of keeping persons convicted of economic crimes and malfeasance in office together with other categories of convicts. Results: we conclude that the public and professionals do not tend to hold extreme positions (ultra-liberal or ultra-radical) in the punishment of persons convicted of economic crimes and malfeasance in office. The public and professionals assess quite realistically the criminal policy of the state and judicial practice at the present stage of the state’s development and allow, within certain limits, the application of punishment in the form of imprisonment to economic and official criminals. We emphasize that both categories of respondents (citizens and convicts) are more inclined to use imprisonment in relation to persons who have committed malfeasance in office than to those who committed economic crimes. We argue that public opinion is dissatisfied with the fact that persons convicted of malfeasance in office and economic crimes are kept together with other categories of convicts. There is no such dissatisfaction in the professional opinion: the majority of interviewed correctional officers do not support the idea of sending those convicted of economic crimes and malfeasance in office to separate correctional institutions. We put forward a proposal concerning the implementation of the idea that persons convicted of economic crimes and malfeasance in office should be held in separate correctional institutions in the course of modernization provided for by the Concept for development of the penal system of the Russian Federation until 2030, which consists in opening joint correctional institutions.
Keywords: convicted person; economic crimes; malfeasance in office; public opinion; professional opinion; punishment; imprisonment; correctional institutions; private prisons
2. Aleksandrova I.A. From preferences to equality: waiting for changes in the new criminal economic policy. VestnikNizhegorodskoi pravovoi akademii=Herald of the Nizhny Novgorod Academy of Law, 2014, no. 3 (3), pp. 29–32. (In Russ.).
3. Bavsun M.V., Borkov V.N., Nikolaev K.D. The concept of modernization of criminal legislation in the economic sphere:a critical analysis. Nauchnyi vestnik Omskoi Akademii MVD Rossii=Scientific Bulletin of Omsk Academy of the Ministry ofInternal Affairs of Russia, 2011, no. 4 (43), pp. 12–16. (In Russ.).
4. V Gosdume predlozhili kaznit’ korruptsionerov i sdelat’ dlya nikh otdel’noe kladbishche [The State Duma proposedto execute corrupt officials and bury them in a separate cemetery]. Available at: https://pikabu.ru/story/v_gosdume_predlozhili_kaznit_korruptsionerov_i_sdelat_dlya_nikh_otdelnoe_kladbishche_6469852 (accessed August 1, 2021).
5. V Rossii mogut poyavit’sya chastnye tyur’my dlya biznesmenov [Private prisons for businessmen may appear in Russia].Available at: http://www.dg-yug.ru/rubriki/world/89867-v-rossii-mogut-poyavitsya-chastnyie-tyurmyi-dlya-biznesmenov.html (accessed April 4, 2017).
6. Ivanov S. Separate sections for entrepreneurs accused of economic crimes will appear in pre-trial detention centers.Rusbase, September 12, 2018. Available at: https://rb.ru/news/sizo-business/ (accessed November 16, 2018). (In Russ.).
7. Interv’yu zamestitelya direktory FSIN Rossii na radiostantsii “Ekho Moskvy” 14 noyabrya 2018 goda. FSIN zayavila onekhvatke mest v koloniyakh dlya byvshikh silovikov [Interview of the Deputy Director of the Federal Penitentiary Serviceof Russia on the radio “Echo of Moscow” on November 14, 2018. FSIN announced a shortage of places in the coloniesfor former security forces officers]. Available at: https://iz.ru/812148/2018-11-14/fsin-zaiavila-o-nekhvatke-mest-vkoloniiakh-dlia-byvshikh-silovikov (accessed July 31,2021).
8. Kleimenov M.P. Problems of codification of the criminal law: history, modernity, future (dedicated to the 200th anniversaryof the draft Criminal Code of 1813). In: Komissarov V.S. (Ed.). Materialy VIII Rossiiskogo kongressa ugolovnogo prava,sostoyavshegosya 30–31 maya 2013 g. [Proceedings of the 8th Russian Congress on Criminal Law, held on May 30–31,2013]. Moscow: Yurlitinform, 2013. 684 p. (In Russ.).
9. Koroleva E. Do your time without trouble: scammers will be saved from rapists. Gazeta RU, September 12, 2018. Availableat: https://www.gazeta.ru/social/2018/09/11/11960965.shtml (accessed November 16, 2018). (In Russ.).
10. Meško G. Expert opinion. In: Seliverstov V.I. (Ed.). Otbyvanie lisheniya svobody osuzhdennymi za ekonomicheskie i(ili) dolzhnostnye prestupleniya: itogi teoreticheskogo issledovaniya [Serving of imprisonment by persons convicted ofeconomic and (or) official crimes: the results of a theoretical study]. Moscow: Yurisprudentsiya, 2019. 464 p. (In Russ.).
11. Nikitina I.A. Improvement of the criminal legislation of the Russian Federation on responsibility for crimes in the sphereof economic activity. In: Komissarov V.S. (Ed.). Materialy VIII Rossiiskogo kongressa ugolovnogo prava, sostoyavshegosya30–31 maya 2013 g. [Proceedings of the 8th Russian Congress on Criminal Law, held on May 30–31, 2013]. Moscow:Yurlitinform, 2013. 684 p. (In Russ.).
12. Is there a need for private prisons in Russia? Special conditions of imprisonment are offered for businessmen.Kommersant FM, March 9, 2017. Available at: http://www.deloros.ru/nuzhny-li-chastnye-tyurmy-v-rossii.html (accessedApril 5, 2017). (In Russ.).
13. On the Concept for development of the penal system of the Russian Federation for the period up to 2030: Resolutionof the Government of the Russian Federation no. 1138-r of April 29, 2021. Sobranie zakonodatel’stva Rossiiskoi Federatsii[Collection of Legislation of the Russian Federation]. 2021. No. 20. Article 3397. (In Russ.).
14. Pertli L.F. Analytical review with proposals based on the results of the study of foreign experience of serving imprisonmentby persons convicted of economic and official crimes, taking into account their criminological and socio-demographiccharacteristics. In: Seliverstov V.I. (Ed.). Otbyvanie lisheniya svobody osuzhdennymi za ekonomicheskie i (ili) dolzhnostnyeprestupleniya: itogi teoreticheskogo issledovaniya [Serving of imprisonment by persons convicted of economic and (or)official crimes: the results of a theoretical study]. Moscow: Yurisprudentsiya, 2019. 464 p.
15. Rogozin spoke in favor of execution rather than imprisonment for corruption in the defense industry. Tekhnologii imedia=Technologies and the Media, August 8, 2021. Available at: https://www.rbc.ru/technology_and_media/08/08/2021/610f07c09a7947abc280d855?utm_source=yxnews&utm_medium=desktoptps (accessed April 5, 2017). (In Russ.).
16. Skakov A.B. Expert opinion. In: Seliverstov V.I. (Ed.). Otbyvanie lisheniya svobody osuzhdennymi za ekonomicheskiei (ili) dolzhnostnye prestupleniya: itogi teoreticheskogo issledovaniya [Serving of imprisonment by persons convicted ofeconomic and (or) official crimes: the results of a theoretical study]. Moscow: Yurisprudentsiya, 2019. 464 p.
17. Smirnov L.B. Kriminologicheskie problemy ugolovnogo nakazaniya v vide lisheniya svobody: korrektsiyatselepolaganiya, printsipov i realizatsii [Criminological problems of criminal punishment in the form of imprisonment:correction of goal-setting, principles and implementation]. Available at: http://www.criminologyclub.ru/home/3-last-sessions/297-2017-03-19-12-26-26.html (accessed March 20, 2017).
18. Shabanov V.B. Expert opinion. In: Seliverstov V.I. (Ed.). Otbyvanie lisheniya svobody osuzhdennymi za ekonomicheskiei (ili) dolzhnostnye prestupleniya: itogi teoreticheskogo issledovaniya [Serving of imprisonment by persons convicted ofeconomic and (or) official crimes: the results of a theoretical study]. Moscow: Yurisprudentsiya, 2019. 464 p
