Lengthy Prison Term as a Psychological Issue in the Penal System of the Russian Federation
Suslov Yu.E. Lengthy prison term as a psychological issue in the penal system of the Russian Federation. Penitentiary Science, 2021, vol. 15, no. 1 (53), pp. 218-223. DOI 10.46741/2686-9764-2021-15-1-218-223.
Introduction: the paper analyzes scientific data related to the definition of the phenomenon “lengthy prison term” and demonstrates a relative and conditional nature of this phenomenon. Available scientific research findings in this area suggest that the duration of serving a sentence is an exclusively subjective measure for various criminals. Goal: to identify the impact of the length of prison sentences on convicts in the context of their reformation. Methods: we use general scientific research methods (analysis, synthesis, comparison, generalization). The work is based on the results derived from the analysis of relevant foreign and domestic studies. Results: by analyzing the influence of specific features inherent in correctional institutions, we reveal the following inconsistency: custodial sentences and lengthy prison terms contribute to the adaptation of convicts to prison conditions, development of negative changes in their personality, destructive conduct, etc. In addition, prolonged stay in a correctional institution reduces the impact of major means of reformation such as prison regime, educational work, and socially useful work. Conclusions: when determining the length of prison term, it is necessary to proceed not so much from the nature and degree of public danger of the act, but from individual features of the criminal’s personality, their social environment, and the motive for the crime committed. It is necessary to abandon the quantitative approach to determining the mea sure of punishment expressed in the length of the prison term.
Keywords: Suslov Yu.E. Lengthy prison term as a psychological issue in the penal system of the Russian Federation. Penitentiary Science, 2021, vol. 15, no. 1 (53), pp. 117–124. DOI 10.46741/2686-9764-2021-15-1-218-223
universiteta im. V.N. Tatishcheva=Tatishchev Volzhsky University Bulletin, 2017, vol. 2, no. 4, pp. 159–167. (In Russ.).
2. Datii A.V., Fedoseev A.A. Criminological and psychological features of convicts with socially significant diseases.
Lichnost’ v menyayushchemsya mire: zdorov’e, adaptatsiya, razvitie=Personality in a Changing World: Health,
Adaptation, Development, 2014, no. 2 (5), pp. 69–79. Available at: https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/kriminologicheskiei-psihologicheskie-osobennosti-bolnyh-sotsialno-znachimymi-zabolevaniyami-osuzhdennyh (accessed March 12, 2020).
(In Russ.).
3. Detkov M.G. Long-term imprisonment: concept, content, effectiveness. Vestnik instituta: prestuplenie, nakazanie,
ispravlenie=Institute Bulletin: Crime, Punishment, Correction, 2008, no. 2, pp. 28–32. Available at: https://cyberleninka.
ru/article/n/dlitelnoe-lishenie-svobody-ponyatie-soderzhanie-effektivnost (accessedApril 2, 2020). (In Russ.).
4. Kornilova T.V. The concept and characteristic features of punishments in the form of long terms imprisonment
in foreign criminal law. Vestnik Voronezhskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Seriya: Pravo=Proceedings of
Voronezh State University. Series: Law, 2018, no. 3 (34), pp. 387–394. Available at: http://www.vestnik.vsu.ru/pdf/
pravo/2018/03/2018-03-37.pdf (accessed: April 3, 2020). (In Russ.).
5. Mukhina V.S., Khvostov A.A. Life prisoners: motivation for life. Razvitie lichnosti=Development of Personality, 2002, no.
3, pp. 51–60. (In Russ.).
6. Rogach V.G. Strategies for overcoming life difficulties in convicts, serving the long sentences of imprisonment. Vestnik
instituta: prestuplenie, nakazanie, ispravlenie=Institute Bulletin: Crime, Punishment, Correction, 2018, no. 1 (41), pp. 122–
129. Available at: https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/strategii-preodoleniya-zhiznennyh-trudnostey-u-osuzhdennyhotbyvayuschih-dlitelnye-sroki-lisheniya-svobody (accessed April 4, 2020). (In Russ.).
7. Savvina E.V. Features of socio-psychological adaptation of convicts to the conditions of a penitentiary institution. Vestnik
Severo-Vostochnogo federal’nogo universiteta im. M. K. Amosova. Seriya: Pedagogika. Psikhologiya. Filosofiya=Vestnik
of North-Eastern Federal University. “Pedagogy. Psychology. Philosophy” Series, 2017, no. 2 (6), pp. 35–43. Available
at: https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/osobennosti-sotsialno-psihologicheskoy-adaptatsii-osuzhdennyh-k-usloviyampenitentsiarnogo-uchrezhdeniya (accessed April 12, 2020). (In Russ.).
8. Skripka L.V. Emotional states of first-time convicts in the process of serving their sentence. Prikladnaya yuridicheskaya
psikhologiya=Applied Legal Psychology, 2014, no. 3, pp. 98–102. Available at: https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/
emotsionalnye-sostoyaniya-vpervye-osuzhdennyh-v-protsesse-otbyvaniya-nakazaniya (accessed April 2, 2020). (In
Russ.).
9. Slavinskaya Yu.V., Kokurin A.V. On the need to develop a comprehensive approach to psychological support for
persons serving life imprisonment. Prikladnaya yuridicheskaya psikhologiya=Applied Legal Psychology, 2009, no. 3,
pp. 108–116. Available at: https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/o-neobhodimosti-razrabotki-kompleksnogo-podhoda-kpsihologicheskomu-soprovozhdeniyu-lits-otbyvayuschih-pozhiznennoe-lishenie-svobody (accessed April 3, 2020). (In
Russ.).
10. Smirnov A.M., Spasennikov B.A. The influence of prolonged isolation from society on ensuring the regime of serving
punishment in places of deprivation of liberty. Vestnik instituta: prestuplenie, nakazanie, ispravlenie=Institute Bulletin:
Crime, Punishment, Correction, 2008, no. 4, pp. 28–30.Available at: https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/vliyanie-dlitelnoyizolyatsii-ot-obschestva-na-obespechenie-rezhima-otbyvaniya-nakazaniya-v-mestah-lisheniya-svobody (accessed
March 3, 2020). (In Russ.).
11. Smirnov A.M. Dlitel’nye sroki lisheniya svobody v otnoshenii osuzhdennykh muzhchin: monografiya [Long terms of
imprisonment in relation to convicted men: monograph]. Moscow: Yurlitinform, 2010. 199 p.
12. Suchkova E.L., Shtefan E.F. Problematique issues of motivation for law-abiding behavior in convicts serving their
sentences under strict conditions of detention. Psikhologiya i pravo=Psychology and Law, 2019, vol. 9, no. 4, pp. 236–248.
(In Russ.).
13. Tsareva E.V. Specifics of emotional experiences of convicted women serving sentences in places of deprivation of
liberty. Vestnik Moskovskogo universiteta MVD Rossii=Bulletin of the Moscow University of the Ministry of Internal Affairs
of Russia, 2009, no. 6, pp. 53–56. Available at: https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/spetsifika-emotsionalnyh-perezhivaniy-uosuzhdennyh-zhenschin-otbyvayuschih-nakazanie-v-mestah-lisheniya-svobody (accessed April 20, 2020). (In Russ.).
14. Shikhantsov G.G. Yuridicheskaya psikhologiya: uchebnik dlya vuzov [Legal psychology: textbook for universities].
Second edition. Moscow: Zertsalo-M, 2006. 272 p.
15. Shishko E.A. Experimental studies of the socio-psychological situation among convicts. Vedomosti ugolovnoispolnitel’noi sistemy=Journal of the Penitentiary System, 2015, no. 8 (159), pp. 46–51. Available at: https://cyberleninka.
ru/article/n/eksperimentalnye-issledovaniya-sotsialno-psihologicheskoy-obstanovki-sredi-osuzhdennyh (accessed April
20, 2020). (In Russ.).
16. Day J.C. et al. Coercion and social support behind bars: testing an integrated theory of misconduct and resistance in
U.S. prisons. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 2015, vol. 42 (2), pp. 133–155. DOI: 10.1177/0093854814546352. Available
at: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0093854814546352 (accessed April 2, 2020).
17. Folk J.B., Disabato D.J., Daylor J.M., Tangney J.P., Barboza S., Wilson J.S., Bonieskie L., Holwager J. Effectiveness of
a self-administered intervention for criminal thinking: Taking a chance on change. Psychological Services, 2016, no. 13 (3),
pp. 272–282. Available at: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4980178/ (accessed October 1, 2020).
18. Cullen F.T. et al. Prisons do not reduce recidivism. The high cost of ignoring science. The Prison Journal, 2011,
vol. 91 (3), pp. 489–659. DOI: 10.1177/0032885511415224. Available at: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/
abs/10.1177/0032885511415224 (accessed April 2, 2020).
19. Ahalt C., Haney C., Rios S., Fox M.P., Farabee D., Williams B. Reducing the use and impact of solitary confinement in
corrections. International Journal of Prisoner Health, 2017, vol. 13, no. 1, pp. 41–48. DOI: 10.1108/IJPH-08-2016-0040.
Available at: https://www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/10.1108/IJPH-08-2016-0040/full/html (accessed October 2,
2020).
20. Stringer H. Improving mental health for inmates. Monitor on Psychology, 2019, vol. 50, no. 3, p. 46. Available at: https://
www.apa.org/monitor/2019/03/mental-heath-inmates# (accessed October 1, 2020).
21. Wittekind K. The bottom two percent: using positive psychology to create change among convicts: a capstone project
submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of masters of applied positive psychology. University of
Pennsylvania, 2018. 74 p. Available at: https://repository.upenn.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1143&context=mapp_
capstone (accessed October 1, 2020).
22. Yoon I.A., Slade K., Fazel S. Outcomes of psychological therapies for prisoners with mental health problems: a systematic
review and meta-analysis. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 2017, no. 85 (8), pp. 783–802. DOI: 10.1037/
ccp0000214/. Available at: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5518650/ (accessed October 22, 2020)
