Studying Hardiness in Convicts Serving Life Imprisonment in a High Security Penal Colony
Kornilova T.V., Pozdnyakov V.M., Balamut A.N. Studying hardiness in convicts serving life imprisonment in a high security penal colony. Penitentiary Science, 2021, vol. 15, no. 1 (53), pp. 210-217. DOI 10.46741/2686-9764-2021-15-1-210-217.
Introduction: the paper proves that when studying hardiness in lifers it is constructive to use a concept developed by Salvatore R. Maddi, in the framework of which a three-component structure of this phenomenon was substantiated and a methodology for its studying was developed. The validity and reliability of this methodology was also confirmed during its initial adaptation in the research group of D.A. Leontiev and in many studies of Russian psychologists, on samples of convicts, too. Aim: to figure out the reasons for such a variety of findings on lifers and to determine their level of hardiness and motivation for pro-social life upon release. To achieve this goal we use the findings of a comprehensive study conducted in 2020 among inmates of Penal Colony no. 5 of the Vologda Oblast Division of the Federal Penitentiary Service of Russia. Methods: we studied the transformation of personality of convicted lifers on a sample of 46 men (aged 28 to 64 and held in the penal colony for the period from 8 to 26 years) with the use of the Hardiness Survey, semistructured interviews and essays – reflective self-reports of inmates on the difficulties that arise in the conditions of the correctional institution. Results: we have revealed that only one in ten convicts (10.9%) has a high level of overall hardiness, while one in four (23.9%) has a low level of overall hardiness. Among the components of hardiness, the lowest scores among the surveyed are observed on the scales “challenge” and “commitment” (37% and 30.4%, respectively). Slightly better scores are on the “control” scale (low level is observed in 26.1% of respondents), according to the data of interviews and essays, are associated with the influence of strict regime conditions. Conclusions: based on all the findings of the research, including the features of lifers’ dominant experiences and motivation for pro-social life on the outside, we substantiate the criteria for assessing their psychological readiness for being released on parole and the need for anthropological proportionality in the treatment of inmates with different levels of subject activity.
Keywords: hardiness; lifers; commitment; control; challenge; correctional institutions; punishment in the form of incarceration; release of lifers on parole; lifers’ personality features.
life imprisonment sentences. Vestnik instituta: prestuplenie, nakazanie, ispravlenie=Institute Bulletin: Crime, Punishment,
Correction, 2018, no. 4 (44), pp. 121–127. (In Russ.).
2. Bystrova T.V., Pozdnyakov V.M. On improving the hardiness of convicts serving lengthy prison terms. Prikladnaya
yuridicheskaya psikhologiya=Applied Legal Psychology, 2017, no. 1, pp. 30–36. (In Russ.).
3. The Federal Penitentiary Service of Russia reported that life prisoners live longer than all other prisoners. Available at:
https://tass.ru/obschestvo/6328959 (accessed January 7, 2021). (In Russ.).
4. Jarrett K. How prison changes personality. Available at: https://www.bbc.com/ukrainian/features-russian-44083238
(accessed January 26, 2021). (In Russ.).
5. Dobryakov D.A., Minyazeva T.F., Pozdnyakov V.M. Trends in the execution of life imprisonment. Vestnik Tomskogo
gosudarstvennogo universiteta=Tomsk State University Bulletin, 2020, no. 457, pp. 221–228. (In Russ.).
6. Brief description of the penal system. Available at: https://fsin.gov.ru/structure/inspector/iao/statistika/Kratkaya%20
har-ka%20UIS/ (accessed January 6, 2021). (In Russ.).
7. Leont’ev D.A., Rasskazova E.I. Test zhiznestoikosti [Hardiness survey]. Moscow: Smysl, 2006. 63 p.
8. Mukhina V.S. Otchuzhdennye: Absolyut otchuzhdeniya: Monografiya [The alienated: the absolute of alienation.
Monograph.]. 2nd edition. Moscow: Svyato-Troitskaya Sergieva Lavra, 2010. 702 p.
9. Nalivaiko T.V. Issledovanie zhiznestoikosti i ee svyazei so svoistvami lichnosti: avtoreferat dissertatsii na soiskanie uchenoi
stepeni kandidata psikhologicheskikh nauk [The study of hardiness and its relations with the personality traits: Candidate of
Sciences (Psychology) dissertation abstract]. Yaroslavl, 2006. 28 p.
10. Life imprisonment. Brief information document. Available at: https://cdn.penalreform.org/wp-content/
uploads/2018/04/pozhiznennoe-zaklyuchenie.pdf (accessed January 27, 2021). (In Russ.).
11. Pozdnyakov V.M. Psychology of anthropological proportionality in the treatment of convicts sentenced to life
imprisonment. In: IV Mezhdunarodnyi penitentsiarnyi forum “Prestuplenie, nakazanie, ispravlenie” (k 140-letiyu ugolovnoispolnitel’noi sistemy Rossii i 85-letiyu Akademii FSIN Rossii): sb. tez. vystuplenii i dokladov uchastnikov (g. Ryazan’, 20–22
noyabrya 2019 g.): v 10 t. [4th International Penitentiary Forum “Crime, punishment, correction” (to the 140th anniversary
of the penal system of Russia and the 85th anniversary of the Academy of the Federal Penitentiary Service of Russia):
collection of concise presentations and reports of participants (Ryazan, November 20–22, 2019): in 10 volumes]. Ryazan:
Akademiya FSIN Rossii, 2019. Volume 8. Pp.145–149. (In Russ.).
12. Illusive release on parole. Vera Vasil’eva talks about lifers. Available at: https://www.svoboda.org/a/30498974.html
(accessed January 8, 2021). (In Russ.).
13. Azarian A., Farokhzadian A.A., Habibi E. Relationship between psychological Hardiness and Emotional Control Index:
a communicative approach. International Journal of Medical Research and Health Sciences, 2016, no. 5, pр. 216–221.
14. Garland D. The Culture of Control. Crime and Social Order in Contemporary Society. Chicago: The University of Chicago
Press; Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2001. 307 p.
15. Kowalski C., Schermer J.A. Hardiness, perseverative cognition, anxiety, and health-related outcomes: a case for and
against psychological hardiness. Psychological Reports, 2019, vol. 122, no. 6. pp. 2096–2118
