So far, the science of penal law has not looked closely into the term “doctrine”, and, in particular, “penal and legal doctrine” from the theoretical point of view. Thus we find it necessary to eliminate this gap, since the use of these terms and their synonyms varies greatly in the scientific and educational activities of penal institutions. Understanding the doctrinal grounds is also important for assessing the current situation and prospects for development of the science of penal law. The article analyzes the usage of the terms “penal and legal doctrine”, “criminal-executive doctrine” “doctrine of criminal-executive law”, “penal doctrine”, “correctional doctrine”; penal and legal doctrine is considered as part of legal doctrine; we study the notion of “legal doctrine” in its relations with adjacent categories (science, concept, position); we also investigate the effects of penal and legal doctrine on the penal and legal policy. We conclude that the term “penal and legal doctrine” is the core one and acts as a necessary prerequisite for scientific analysis. We also provide recommendations for the use of the term “doctrine” in the penal law sphere and put forward our own definition of the term “penal and legal doctrine”. In the course of our research we used general scientific, sectoral (social narrative) and level methodology (methods of theoretical and metatheoretical levels of cognition in science).
Doctor of Sciences (Pedagogy), Candidate of Sciences (Law), Associate Professor, professor of the Department of Personality Psychology and Special Education at Vladimir State University Named After Alexander and Nikolay Stoletovs, Vladimir, Russian
Federation, professor of the Department of Psychology and Pedagogy of Professional Activity at Vladimir Law Institute of FSIN Russia, Vladimir, Russian Federation, professor of the Department of Legal Psychology and Pedagogy at Vologda Institute of Law and Economics of FSIN Russia, Vologda, Russian Federation.
, e-mail email@example.com
Candidate of Sciences (Law), associate professor of the Department of Theory and History of State and Law at Vladimir Branch of the Russian Academy of National Economy and Public Administration under the President of the Russian Federation, Vladimir,
Russian Federation, associate professor of the Department of Public Law Disciplines of the Faculty of Law and Management at Vladimir Law Institute of FSIN Russia, Vladimir, Russian Federation.
, e-mail firstname.lastname@example.org
1. Baranov V.M. Kontseptsiya zakonoproekta. ucheb: posobieт [Concept of a draft law: textbook]. Nizhny Novgorod, 2003. 190 p.
2. Baturina S.V. Traditsii rossiiskoi pravovoi doktriny. Avtoref. dis. … kand. yurid. nauk [Traditions of Russian legal doctrine:
Candidate of Sciences (Law) dissertation abstract]. Krasnodar, 2008. 27 p.
3. Berkov V.F. Filosofiya i metodologiya nauki: ucheb. posobie [Philosophy and methodology of science: textbook]. Moscow:
Novoe znanie, 2004. 336 p.
4. Zelenkevich I.S. Legal doctrine and legal science: some aspects of correlation and use as sources of law. SeveroVostochnyi nauchnyi zhurnal = North-Eastern Scientific Journal, 2010, no. 2, pp. 42-47. (In Russ.).
5. Zozulya A.S. Doktrina v sovremennom prave. Avtoref. dis. … kand. yurid. nauk [Doctrine in modern law: Candidate of
Sciences (Law) dissertation abstract]. Saint Petersburg, 2006. 31 p.
6. Ibragimova Yu.E. The role of judicial doctrines in establishing and elimination of gaps in legislation. Zhurnal rossiiskogo
prava = Journal of Russian Law, 2019, no. 11, pp. 80-95. (In Russ.).
7. Korsakov K.V. Alternatives to deprivation of liberty as a way out of the crisis of modern penal practice. Pravookhranitel’nye
organy: teoriya i praktika=Law Enforcement Agencies: Theory and Practice, 2018, no. 1, pp. 23-26. (In Russ.).
8. Madaev E.O. Doktrina v pravovoi sisteme rossiiskoi federatsii. Diss. … kand. yurid. nauk [Doctrine in the legal system of
the Russian Federation: Candidate of Sciences (Law) dissertation]. Moscow, 2012. 254 p.
9. Mal’ko A.V., Romashov R.A., Timofeeva E.A. Penal and legal policy of Russia: constitutional foundations (review of
materials of an all-Russian round table) (Samara, December 12, 2013). Gosudarstvo i pravo = State and Law, 2014, no. 12,
pp. 106-114. (In Russ.).
10. Polyanskii D.A., Puzikov R.V. Legal doctrine as a special legal phenomenon. Vestnik TGU = Tambov University Review,
2013, no. 11 (127). Available at: https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/pravovaya-doktrina-kak-osoboe-pravovoe-yavlenie
(accessed July 1, 2020). (In Russ.).
11. Puzikov R.V. Yuridicheskaya doktrina v sfere pravovogo regulirovaniya (problemy teorii i praktiki): dis. kand. yurid.
nauk [Legal doctrine in the sphere of legal regulation (problems of theory and practice): Candidate of Sciences (Law)
dissertation]. Tambov, 2003. 196 p.
12. Seliverstov V.I. Correctional doctrine and its impact on the status of an individual exonerated from serving their sentences.
Yuridicheskii vestnik Samarskogo universiteta = Juridical Journal of Samara University, 2018, no. 2, pp. 65-73. (In Russ.).
13. Kuznetsov V.G. (Ed.). Slovar’ filosofskikh terminov [Dictionary of philosophical terms]. Moscow: INFRA-M, 2004. 731 p.
14. Sovremennyi slovar’ inostrannykh slov [Modern dictionary of foreign words]. Moscow: Rus. yaz., 1993. 740 p.
15. Teplyashin P.V. Theoretical foundations of modern comparative research on European penal systems. Sovremennoe
pravo = Modern Law, 2015, no. 1, pp. 112-116. (In Russ.).
16. Shakhanov V.V. “Horizontal” and “vertical” structuring of elements of the legal system as a reflection of its metaphenomenality (revisiting the issue of conceptual series of legal categories). Pravovaya politika i pravovaya zhizn’ = Legal
Policy and Legal Life, 2019, no. 2, pp. 114-119. (In Russ.).